Paragraph 7 from the affidavit of the homeowner swore that he did not consent or sign the eNote. The judge’s order says the defendant asserts in paragraph 7 that he never denies signed the “MORTGAGE”. He doesn’t specifically say eNote but references the affidavit which word for word attacks the eNote. It appears the Court construed Homeowner not signing the eNote or consenting to eNote as grounds to find that he did not sign the mortgage. Very Interesting!